Future Proof My PC. Due to optimizations and some unlocked features, the performance in these applications is much better compared to a consumer Radeon GPU. You can select more than one device. The FirePro M was released over a year more recently than the Quadro M , and so the FirePro M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro M. Intel Extreme Graphics 2. SPECviewperf 12 – Energy energy x

Uploader: Shakatilar
Date Added: 21 April 2010
File Size: 48.83 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 18055
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. Windows 7 Experience Index – Gaming 4m000.

World of Tanks v8 Global Game Awards mm4000 SPECviewperf 11 – Lightwave x Compared to the Radeon consumer line, the FirePro offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications. From digital content creators on a movie set, to design engineers at a remote plant, to geo-scientists on an oil rig, Quadro mobile graphics processing units GPUs are the trusted solution for professional 3D applications. Overall, the card is able to run modern games in medium details and HD resolution fluently.


AMD FirePro M vs AMD FirePro M

Cinebench R10 – Shading 32Bit. Please, switch off ad blockers. SPECviewperf 11 – Maya x SPECviewperf 12 – Showcase showcase x So the results don’t have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. Windows 7 Experience Index – Gaming graphics.

AMD FirePro M compare Nvidia Quadro M GPU

Compared to Radeon HD M, its central unit is slightly higher clocked but overall its gaming performance is identical to Radeon HD M because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN’s architecture potential while FirePro M is made for professional applications.

SPECviewperf 12 – Medical medical x SPECviewperf 12 – Energy energy x Created at Mon, 24 Dec Cinebench R15 – Ref. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro M is and the actual shader performance of the Quadro M is SPECviewperf 11 – Catia x SPECviewperf 11 – Lightwave x Windows 7 Experience Index – Graphics. SPECviewperf 11 – Tcvis x Cinebench R10 – Shading 32Bit.

SPECviewperf 12 – Solidworks sw x For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. The maximum power consumption under full load should be around 30 watts estimatemaking the card suitable for laptops 15 inches in size or greater.


World of Tanks v8 You can select more than one device. Due to optimizations and some unlocked features, the performance when using professional applications is more efficient with the FirePro M Other features of the series include ZeroCore for reducing power consumption when the display is turned off and Power Gating to power down areas of firrepro chip that are not used.

While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the FirePro M should consume less power than the Quadro M.

Additionally, it now allows audio to output simultaneously and in parallel to firfpro devices with the new Discrete Digital Multipoint Audio DDMA feature. SPECviewperf 12 – Creo creo x Dell Precision M M